header banner
Default

Investors have accused Elon Musk of insider trading in the Dogecoin lawsuit


Table of Contents

    Illustration shows Elon Musk and representations of cryptocurrency Dogecoin

    A photo of Elon Musk is displayed on a smartphone placed on representations of cryptocurrency Dogecoin in this illustration taken June 16, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/ Acquire Licensing Rights

    • Companies

    NEW YORK, June 1 (Reuters) - Elon Musk is being accused of insider trading in a proposed class action by investors accusing the Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) CEO of manipulating the cryptocurrency Dogecoin, costing them billions of dollars.

    In a Wednesday night filing in Manhattan federal court, investors said Musk used Twitter posts, paid online influencers, his 2021 appearance on NBC's "Saturday Night Live" and other "publicity stunts" to trade profitably at their expense through several Dogecoin wallets that he or Tesla controls.

    Investors said this included when Musk sold about $124 million of Dogecoin in April after he replaced Twitter's blue bird logo with Dogecoin's Shiba Inu dog logo, leading to a 30% jump in Dogecoin's price.

    A "deliberate course of carnival barking, market manipulation and insider trading" enabled Musk to defraud investors, promote himself and his companies, the filing said.

    Musk bought Twitter last October. He also runs SpaceX, a rocket and spacecraft manufacturer, as well as Tesla, which makes electric cars.

    Alex Spiro, a lawyer for Musk and Tesla, declined to comment on Thursday. The investors' lawyer did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    Investors have accused Musk, the world's second-richest person according to Forbes magazine, of deliberately driving up Dogecoin's price more than 36,000% over two years and then letting it crash.

    They included their latest accusations in a proposed third amended complaint, in a lawsuit that began last June.

    Musk and Tesla had in March sought a dismissal of the second amended complaint, calling it a "fanciful work of fiction," and on May 26 said another amendment was unjustified.

    In a Wednesday order, U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein said he would "likely" allow the third amended complaint, saying the defendants would not likely be prejudiced.

    Hellerstein also granted the investors' request to dismiss the nonprofit Dogecoin Foundation as a defendant. Its lawyer Seth Levine called the dismissal "the appropriate result."

    The case is Johnson et al v. Musk et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 22-05037.

    Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Marguerita Choy

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    Sources


    Article information

    Author: Daniel Graham

    Last Updated: 1698856562

    Views: 1260

    Rating: 4.1 / 5 (48 voted)

    Reviews: 96% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Daniel Graham

    Birthday: 1985-09-21

    Address: 001 Tommy Hill Suite 612, Morganburgh, MS 47705

    Phone: +4327924754668650

    Job: Quantum Physicist

    Hobby: Cooking, Backpacking, Yoga, Stargazing, Rock Climbing, Bird Watching, Playing Chess

    Introduction: My name is Daniel Graham, I am a irreplaceable, skilled, tenacious, vivid, Determined, lively, expert person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.